Math 214 vs math 217. It’s starting to get challenging since it’s different than my previous math classes. Hope College (9/19) If you want to take later math classes, especially ones that involves proofs, 217 is a must. This is a difficult course, and those interested only in the computational side of linear algebra should consider Math 214 or 417 Upon passing math 217, students can progress into math 222. Math 216 (Intro to Diff EQ), Math 217 (Linear Algebra), or Math 286 (Honors Diff EQ)? I heard Math 216 is easier than Calc 3 I heard Honors math classes have more generous curves on exams than normal classes but Math 217 allows me to take financial math in the future (not 100% this will happen though) I'm a business major by the way. Consequently, this course is a prerequisite for most higher level math courses. The requirement says that you need Math 214 or 217 for the major. Math 217: Integrated Statistics Course Description A stretched version of statistics over two quarters. Other paths involving 201, 202, and 214 are also possible. <p>so im probably gona take either one of the courses listed, it seems to me that 217 actually covers more than 417/419. Also 214 is lecture 217 is small groups working on worksheets with occasional lextures by your instructor, it’s mainly the students teaching themselves and can ask the instructor for help/guidance. As an engineering student, would I gain anything from taking MATH-316 over MATH-216? If I plan on taking classes like Math 465 and 475 should I take 217 or can I succeed in them with only 214. 171≠ 114 and 217≠221, but 171&217=114&221. Prerequisites: Three courses beyond Math 110 Background and Goals: This course is an introduction to the properties of and operations on matrices with a wide variety of applications. I’ve heard 214 and 417 are the exact same class, but 417 is labeled that so that graduate students are able to take it. Note that: Math 171 is offered ONLY in the Fall. MATH 214, 217, 417, or 419? How do these compare? I know math majors are stuck with having to take 217, but for those not majoring in math, how do these versions compare? I know 214 and 417 among the easier options, so I'm looking for more details than just XXX is easier. The Math Calculator will evaluate your problem down to a final solution. Otherwise if you just need a linear algebra credit, take 214 or one of the other ones as they are much easier. Has anyone taken 417 or 419? How’s it compare to 217?</p> title Second semester freshman here, taking Math 214. 171 is the prereq for 217. It was by no means easy. Take Math 214 if you're taking Math 214/217 for linear algebra knowledge. Alternatives: Students can take Math 114 and Math 221 instead of Math 171 and Math 217. My intro math classes were 201/204- certainly not on the level of 215/217! I ended up not taking 215 (I had some moderately advanced engineering math courses, and got an exception to basically self-study 215 over the I took math 115 116 215 and 214 here and 214 was by far the worst one. 5 Vector operations in Mathematica 2. Has anyone been through either class? I want to take EECS 445 in the fall so I need to take linear algebra but I'm also going on vacation in May so I won't be able to attend classes in person for like 2 weeks. 3 Multiplication of Matrices 2. It was definitely tough and took a lot of effort to learn and practice the content. <p>I’m a prospective CS major (from LSA) and I’m wondering how does Math 214 compare to Math 417 and 216 in terms of content? On the course guide, 214 is listed as linear algebra and differential equations while in the math course catalog it is simply listed as Linear Algebra. Taking 217 as a sophomore seems pretty on par. Its students learn linear algebra by deriving it from first principles, for the entire semester. Like, is certain important material omitted from certain versions? May 15, 2006 · You can still be a math major taking 203/204, but you’ll be a bit behind because 215/217 is just so rigorous that it gives ppl a better preperation for higher level math— that being said, one of my best friends is a math major having taken only 201 in her freshman year, her sophomore year she took 214 and 217, along with a 300 level math Jul 26, 2019 · While MATH 214 is designed for engineering students and emphasizes practical applications, MATH 217 is a requirement for math majors and is used by the math department to teach proof-writing. I'd say don't be afraid to use services like the Decima Robinson Center for help/review (not sure how they're operating with everything online, but I can say it was a super helpful resource to me). If you take 214, you will still need to complete 215 - 217 or 203 - 204 to prepare for 300-level math courses. I don’t think reading the textbook and doing exercises is a good idea to prep. I haven’t taken 215 or 217, but from what I hear they are a much more traditional michigan math experience, and they have a higher workload. Credit Exclusions: No credit granted to those who have completed or are enrolled in MATH 214, 217, 419, or 420. if you like proofs i would try 217 but if not definitely don’t take it you’ll be fine with 214 I know when I enrolled for Math 214 there wasn’t a ton of posts on this class, and be it that I had the opportunity to do this class twice I thought I would leave a review out there. I took 217 during my sophomore year along with 281, and while sometimes I felt pressed, if you're able to manage time well, you can succeed in both classes. Math 214 is also linear algebra, so I would think it would count as well? Math 214 vs 417 I’m thinking about taking linear algebra, but Im not sure which course to take specifically. 217 is entirely proof based, and also includes an introduction to topology and other concepts that you don't touch in 215. my prof just runs through one example and expects us to generalize it immediately, and by the end the entire class has a collective look of confusion. I took linear algebra at my previous institution, but I am planning on taking 217 this Fall because it does a better job at teaching the concepts behind linear algebra, which will help you out a lot if you take 445. MATH 217 + MATH 17 MATH 217 is the first of a two-course sequence in the study of statistical methods integrated with algebraic tools to prepare students to analyze processes encountered in society and the workplace. That isn't to say MATH 214 is useless, either. I don't believe that having math 215 would make 217 notably easier (if any easier at all ) MATH 214, 217, 417, or 419? Which is best, especially if you're CS? 214 supposedly is not too bad. You have to take both 171 and 217. ), I would highly recommend 217. That being said, I took 214 with Litvak last year and I will say his quizzes aren’t very similar to his practice quizzes. 4 Multiplication of Vectors 1. You can also add, subtraction, multiply, and divide and complete any arithmetic you need. A bunch of people here are giving bad advice (I majored in math, worked as a 217 HW helper, and also took EECS 281). my only saving grace gonna be the 5 points of EC we get from If you're interested in getting into Machine Learning, then I would suggest taking Math 217 instead. *Math (or MTH) 213 and 214 together are equivalent to MTH 1554 (154); Math (or MTH) 214 and 320 together are equivalent to MTH 1555 (155) and 2554 (254). This semester, I'm enrolled in 216. . The upper level courses are a good time (although I was a pure math major so I can’t necessarily speak specifically to the fin math courses), I think 217 was peak for the most time consuming for me. Students should leave this course prepared to both use linear algebra and to succeed in further theoretical courses i took 214 as a data science major and it was good for me. the content is so dry however it is impossible to fail Math 115 and 214 were admittedly a struggle given that gap. i hear 217 is an awesome class but harder and more workload but worth it. straightaway with 5s in Calc BC etc. the first hw had like 3 questions we never went over in class, and it took a study group of 5 ppl an hour to solve one of them. true omg ikr. If you are doing any sort of Math major (Math, Stats, CS, etc. Any tips… MAT215-217 and MAT216-218 are designed to give students an authentic experience of how mathematicians think about problems and introduce the basic tools of logical argument and abstraction that are needed in upper division mathematics courses. I would frame Math 217 as an intro proofs class in which you apply/develop your proof techniques by applying them to linear algebra. 114&221: Math 171 and 217 is a two semester sequence that is the equivalent to Math 114 and 221. If you really want the best possible understanding of linear algebra theory, then those classes are probably better. Some eventual math majors start in MAT 103/104/201/202 in the freshman year. Unless you want to take 171 next fall and 217 next spring, take 221. I did pretty decent throughout the semester but not insanely good but after the grades were scaled I still finished with an A. The sample used broadly reflects the US population. Depends on your vibes. No Lab. It is widely regarded as difficult because it is very different than previous math classes, and requires a deep understanding of linear algebra on an abstract as well as an intuitive level. 3 Linear Functions 1. I'm thinking of taking Math 217 in Spring 2022 (so I don't have other classes going on during it). Vectors and Vector Operations 1. I am currently in math 217. However, I think it’s definitely a doable as long as you study and do a lot of practice problems, and if you’re having trouble then go to office hours, ask questions, and use the Math Learning Center. I took 214, but looking back, I wish I took 217. If I can and do record it as p/f will I have to take it or math 214 again cuz its a requirement for the major? or can I still declare with a Pass from math 217? The sequence concludes with multivariable calculus, Calculus III (MATH 215). Matrices and Matrix Operations 2. My program (geophysics) doesn't require it, but I'm thinking of taking MATH 217 (honours vector/multivariable calculus) in place of the standard 200 and 317 (Calculus 3/4). I may want to take eecs 442 at some point but I don’t know if I should take 217 or 214. - is this accurate? The drift of this thread is very discouraging in light of my taking 214 or 215/217. 217 is the best way for someone with no proof experience to learn linear algebra. I started in MAE, and only switched into the math department at the end of sophomore year. Does anyone know if lectures are recorded and if attendance is required for math 214 or math 217? What is the difference between Math 214 and Math 216? I looked at the course descriptions on the course catalog and I can't really say what the difference between the two classes is. Students should leave this course prepared both to use linear algebra and to succeed in further theoretical courses in mathematics. 221 is designed for people without incoming calc knowledge, so you should be more than fine. MATH 217 is a course that is supposed to cover the material of MATH 200 and MATH 317 in a single semester. I’m taking eecs 203, eecs 280, and math 285 right now and I am trying to figure out next semester. This course covers an introduction to algebra and descriptive statistics in I'm a freshman in engineering, and I just took Math 215 last semester. Are there separate departmental placement tests for math, or do they place you according to your math-related background+standardized exams? The math lab is an option and so are office hours. Those interested in a more complete description of the 2025 norms are encouraged to review the 2025 MAP Growth norms technical manual. I’m taking Engineering 100 probably section 320 if anyone knows about that, EECS 281, Greek mythology, and then either 214 or 217. Prospective mathematics majors should consult with the department early and plan a program that includes as much of the 215-217-300 or 216-218 sequence as possible. 171&217 Vs. However it is a big time sink 214: Heard it’s meh semi decent idk Rob 101: New class, doesn’t cover the theory as well when I talked to the teacher, still seems cool and isn’t insanely rigorous Matrix Algebra 1. Math 205 - Calculus of Several Variables Math 214 - Applied Linear Algebra Math 215 - Multivariable & Vector Calculus Math 216 - Introduction to Differential Equations Math 217 - Linear Algebra Most math majors will learn more about algebra and number theory in upper-division courses. I was able to pull off an A, but that doesn't really reflect how I felt about the class. Consequently, this course has two major goals: to learn linear algebra and to learn how to write a rigorous mathematical proof. I expect to get an A or higher on the final as well and end the course with an A. 217 has a good deal of workload, but IMO it takes I am requesting that the math department re-eval the course equivalency and give me credit for Math-217 instead of Math-214, is this a viable request? Has anyone actually executed that transfer? I know taking math at WCC and MCC are pretty common. Just for context: I’m a compsci major, math minor- and am usually a B-B+ student. In the end, I'm personally glad I took it rather than, say, Math 214, but of course unless you're a math major/minor there's no good reason to take it if it'll mean sacrificing your time and/or grades. </p> Hi! I'm a freshman currently planning to double major in Computer Science and Statistics, but part of me is thinking of swapping the Statistics for Math. While I won't be taking these one of these classes next semester, I would like to be prepared ahead of time by knowing which one I should take. <p>The AP credit tables recommend placement into 211/215 etc. 4 Geometric But it is by no means a requirement. It's much more application based, and you will definitely learn new concepts. An essential feature of the course is the interspersing of precalculus material as needed for calculus topics. Students who have an interest in theory or who intend to take more advanced courses in Mathematics should follow MATH 215 by the sequence MATH 217-316 (Linear Algebra-Differential Equations). In order to do this more easily, we have been offered 1 hour of extra lecture time per week. Also, should I take 217 without much… MATH 214 is a horribly designed course (have tried taking it 2x here in 2 different semesters was the same level of difficulty and mismanagement each time) and MATH 217 lives in infamy for a reason. the first time I took this class was with Alexander Litvak in the winter 217 is usually the first math class involving proofs. My question is would it be beneficial for me to take math 217/317 as opposed to 214/215? I do know that the courses are probably more interesting, but I am slightly concerned about the difficulty. </p> <p>Also in terms of difficulty how does it compare with 215 and 216? Thanks. 1 Types of Vectors 1. not excited for the rest of the semester. In terms of difficulty 417 < 214 < 217,but if you're in a field where linear algebra is a useful skill I'd take 217 We will not only study the above concepts and their applications, but also the methods by which one proves the foundational results in linear algebra. 2 Multiplication of Vectors by Matrices - Linear Functions 2. Standard_Ad_1493 can you record Math 217 as p/f as a data science major in lsa. 214 is OK, but it is what I'd consider the bare minimum as far as linear algebra courses go. 2 Vector Operations 1. Math 217 is offered ONLY in the Spring. For the purposes of program requirements and/or prerequisites, students who complete both math 171 and 217 will be considered to have completed math 114 (precalculus) and math 221 (calculus 1) Completion of Math 217 implies completion of Math 221 and Math 114. It'll train your brain to think of math abstractly. Posted by u/ripthetrees - 1 vote and no comments Does Math 214 count as Math 217? I'm an IOE student looking to get a math minor, and for some of the third year courses, they say you need math 217 (linear algebra) as a prerequisite. They're similar courses. Bonus points if you've taken either one of them. In total, 344 growth models were evaluated to identify 86 unique models for both student and school achievement and growth norms. I took a Linear Algebra course in high school that transferred in as Math 214. I took 171 because it was explained poorly to me at SOAR which math class I had to take. 217: Best class to learn from. 1 Matrices, addition, subtraction and multiplication bv a number 2. 171 and 217 together are the equivalent of Math 114 and 221, but individually don't really count for anything. For background, I didn’t do too great in math 215, got a B on the first midterm in 217 and now on the 2nd midterm I got an A+. Does anybody know what the difference between Math 214 and Math 215 is? The descriptions for both classes are almost the same. If linear algebra and proof-based mathematics are both unfamiliar, you may find it useful to sit in on both 204 and 217 for the first few weeks, doing problem sets for both classes, before you decide which is better for you. ep5pd, k4iqf, lngns, dkda, lozbr, ia3ej, zttn, zwrkgk, dwbzl, qf2a,